| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
tracing: Do not initialize tracefs work if tracing is disabled
If trace buffer allocation fails during early boot (e.g. in
early_trace_init() -> allocate_trace_buffers()), tracing_disabled is
left set to 1 and the global trace array events list remains
uninitialized.
Later during boot, tracer_init_tracefs() (invoked via fs_initcall)
queues tracerfs_init_work asynchronously without checking if tracing was
disabled. When tracer_init_tracefs_work_func() runs, it calls
event_trace_init() and init_tracer_tracefs(&global_trace, NULL)
unconditionally. This leads to __find_event_file() dereferencing an
uninitialized tr->events list, causing an early boot NULL pointer
dereference Oops:
BUG: Kernel NULL pointer dereference on read at 0x00000010
Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000485be0
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 7 [#1]
...
NIP [c000000000485be0] __find_event_file+0x70/0x3c0
LR [c000000000448874] init_tracer_tracefs+0x274/0xc80
Call Trace:
init_tracer_tracefs+0x274/0xc80
tracer_init_tracefs_work_func+0x50/0x320
process_one_work+0x1e8/0x5c0
worker_thread+0x1dc/0x3d0
kthread+0x194/0x1b0
start_kernel_thread+0x14/0x18
Check tracing_disabled at the beginning of tracer_init_tracefs_work_func()
and return immediately if tracing is disabled or failed to initialize,
preventing the crash. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
Drivers: hv: Avoid infinite retry loop in init_vp_index()
There is a retry loop in init_vp_index() where the CPUs from a certain
node are stripped out if they have already been in the allocated cpumask
or not in HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ housekeeping cpumask. If there is no
CPU left, the allocated cpumask is ignored and the process is retried
again. However, if the HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ housekeeping cpumask turns
out not to contain any CPU in that particular node, that will become an
infinite retry loop. This particular problem was reported by sashiko
[1]. This should rarely happen, but we still need to guard against this.
Fix this infinite loop problem by also skipping NUMA node that has no
housekeeping CPU in the inner while loop of init_vp_index(). Also update
the early abort check to check for the absence of online housekeeping
CPUs instead of just the emptiness of the cpumask. As the outer for
loop will only be reached if the housekeeping cpumask has at least one
online CPU, a NUMA node with housekeeping CPUs will eventually be found. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
io_uring: don't flood a cancelling task with task_work
io_ring_exit_work() asks each task which has used the ring to remove its
tctx node, by task_work, and repeats that until the list is empty.
io_tctx_exit_cb() doesn't touch the node while the task is in
io_uring_cancel_generic(), which removes all the nodes at its end. So the
work item queues the callback again as soon as it has completed, for
nothing.
That is more than a waste of time. task_work_run() only returns when it
finds the list empty. If the rings are released from inside the
cancellation, because requests of other rings held the last references to
their files, up to 64 work items keep sending callbacks to the one task
which is running them. It never finds the list empty, never gets back to
the cancellation, the nodes stay, and so it goes on: a task with 60 pairs
of rings which poll each other ran 280000 callbacks in 5 seconds, 20
seconds after exit_group(). It ends when all the senders happen to be late
at the same time. Until then the task keeps a CPU and the work items busy.
An exiting task can't be killed meanwhile. execve() cancels the requests in
the same way, so a live task can get stuck there as well, for minutes. If
it takes more than five, the work items run into the
WARN_ON_ONCE(time_after(jiffies, timeout)) of io_ring_exit_work(). No
privilege is needed for any of this.
If the callback has met a task in cancellation, wait a little before it is
sent again. Nobody has to wake the work item up for that: either the node
is gone by then, or it is the turn of the next round. |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:CVE-2026-108060: Nombre in ‘/Trabajadores/Create’. |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108059: Observaciones in ‘/Terceros/Create’; |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108058: Nombre in ‘/PlantillasMail/Edit’; |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108057: Nombre in ‘/PlantillasPdf/Edit/1273129’; |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108056: NombrePF in ‘/Empresas/Create’; |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108055: Nombre in ‘/Inmuebles/Create’; |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108054: Nombre in ‘/Familias/Edit/{id}’; |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108053: Nombre in ‘/CuentasCorrientes/Create’; |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108052: Codigo in ‘/CategoriasFicheros/Edit/{id}’; |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108051: Nombre in ‘/Articulos/Create’; |
| A stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Alosuite that affects the delivery note functionality. Insufficient sanitization and encoding of the specified fields allow JavaScript to be stored, which executes in other users’ browsers when they view the affected records. Exploitation requires authenticated access to the affected functionality. The code can alter the displayed content and perform actions within the context of the victim’s session. The list of features, parameters, and endpoints is as follows:
CVE-2026-108050: ReferenceOtherParty in ‘/Documents/DeliveryNotes/Edit/{id}’; |
| Clickjacking vulnerability in the Alosuite web application. The affected login interface can be embedded in a web page controlled by an attacker because it does not implement adequate user interface protection mechanisms, such as the X-Frame-Options header or an appropriate Content-Security-Policy (frame-ancestors) directive. By tricking a victim into interacting with a malicious web page, an attacker can trigger unwanted actions within the Alosuite application embedded in the frame, which could compromise the integrity of user interactions and facilitate further attacks against authenticated users. |
| Vulnerability due to a lack of request limits in Alosuite’s password recovery functionality. The ‘/Account/resetPwd’ endpoint does not enforce adequate restrictions on the number or frequency of password reset requests sent for a single account. As a result, a remote attacker can repeatedly call the endpoint to generate an unlimited number of password reset emails addressed to a user, causing an email flood and enabling abuse of the password recovery mechanism. The absence of request limits or other controls against automation can harm legitimate users, consume application and email infrastructure resources, and facilitate automated attacks against the password recovery service. |
| Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in Alosuite due to insufficient authorization checks when processing object identifiers. By modifying the identifier provided to the ‘/Companies/Edit/{id}’ endpoint, an attacker can access information associated with other companies or users without the appropriate authorization. The vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote attackers to enumerate valid object identifiers and retrieve information that should be restricted to authorized users, resulting in the unauthorized disclosure of application data. |
| HomeBox is a home inventory and organization system. Prior to version 0.27.0, Homebox validates generic notifier URLs with ValidateNotifierURL before creation, update, testing, and scheduled delivery, but shoutrrr sends the request through http.DefaultClient.Do without a CheckRedirect policy that revalidates each Location target. An authenticated collection member can configure a permitted notifier host that redirects to loopback, link-local, cloud metadata, or another blocked destination, causing the follow-up request to bypass the product's SSRF policy. The flaw is reachable through POST /api/v1/notifiers/test for immediate requests and through stored notifiers during scheduled maintenance delivery. This issue is fixed in version 0.27.0. |
| Atlantis is a self-hosted golang application that listens for Terraform pull request events via webhooks. From version 0.4.0 until 0.47.1, Atlantis passes the pull-request-controlled workspace value from atlantis.yaml into Terraform command arguments that are joined with strings.Join(args, " ") and executed through sh -c. An authenticated contributor whose pull request is eligible for an Atlantis plan can include shell metacharacters in the workspace name, causing arbitrary commands to execute as the Atlantis service account without custom workflows, apply permission, or a malicious Terraform provider. External contributors can reach the flaw through fork pull requests only when --allow-fork-prs is enabled, while eligible same-repository branches do not require that option. The commands inherit the Atlantis process environment and can access cloud-provider, Terraform, and version-control credentials as well as files, state, and network resources available to the service. This issue is fixed in version 0.47.1. |
| MLflow is an open source AI engineering platform for agents, large language models, and machine learning models. From 2.19.0 until 3.17.0, mlflow.crewai.autolog() records CrewAI Agent objects without consistently sanitizing nested credential-bearing values. mlflow/crewai/autolog.py::_get_agent_attributes() converts the Agent llm field to a string that includes the provider API key, while mlflow/crewai/autolog.py::_construct_full_inputs() expands the Agent object into mlflow.spanInputs. Applications can therefore send plaintext provider credentials to the MLflow trace backend or a configured OTLP destination, where trace readers can obtain them. This issue is fixed in version 3.17.0. |
