Export limit exceeded: 418275 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (3165 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-39337 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Click Studios Passwordstate Core before 9.8 build 9858 allows Authentication Bypass. | ||||
| CVE-2025-27616 | 1 Go-vela | 1 Server | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| Vela is a Pipeline Automation (CI/CD) framework built on Linux container technology written in Golang. Prior to versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3, by spoofing a webhook payload with a specific set of headers and body data, an attacker could transfer ownership of a repository and its repo level secrets to a separate repository. These secrets could be exfiltrated by follow up builds to the repository. Users with an enabled repository with access to repo level CI secrets in Vela are vulnerable to the exploit, and any user with access to the CI instance and the linked source control manager can perform the exploit. Versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3 fix the issue. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2011-20002 | 1 Siemens | 3 Simatic, Simatic S7-1200, Simatic S7-1200 Cpu | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU V1 family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V2.0.2), SIMATIC S7-1200 CPU V2 family (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V2.0.2). Affected controllers are vulnerable to capture-replay in the communication with the engineering software. This could allow an on-path attacker between the engineering software and the controller to execute any previously recorded commands at a later time (e.g. set the controller to STOP), regardless whether or not the controller had a password configured. | ||||
| CVE-2025-25182 | 1 Gchq | 1 Stroom | 2026-04-15 | 9.4 Critical |
| Stroom is a data processing, storage and analysis platform. A vulnerability exists starting in version 7.2-beta.53 and prior to versions 7.2.24, 7.3-beta.22, 7.4.4, and 7.5-beta.2 that allows authentication bypass to a Stroom system when configured with ALB and installed in a way that the application is accessible not through the ALB itself. This vulnerability may also allow for server-side request forgery which may lead to code execution or further privileges escalations when using the AWS metadata URL. This scenario assumes that Stroom must be configured to use ALB Authentication integration and the application is network accessible. The vulnerability has been fixed in versions 7.2.24, 7.3-beta.22, 7.4.4, and 7.5-beta.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23114 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A vulnerability in Veeam Updater component allows Man-in-the-Middle attackers to execute arbitrary code on the affected server. This issue occurs due to a failure to properly validate TLS certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2025-23091 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| An Improper Certificate Validation on UniFi OS devices, with Identity Enterprise configured, could allow a malicious actor to execute a man-in-the-middle (MitM) attack during application update. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22874 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| Calling Verify with a VerifyOptions.KeyUsages that contains ExtKeyUsageAny unintentionally disabledpolicy validation. This only affected certificate chains which contain policy graphs, which are rather uncommon. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22223 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Spring Security 6.4.0 - 6.4.3 may not correctly locate method security annotations on parameterized types or methods. This may cause an authorization bypass. You are not affected if you are not using @EnableMethodSecurity, or you do not have method security annotations on parameterized types or methods, or all method security annotations are attached to target methods | ||||
| CVE-2024-39341 | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium | ||
| Entrust Instant Financial Issuance (On Premise) Software (formerly known as Cardwizard) 6.10.0, 6.9.0, 6.9.1, 6.9.2, and 6.8.x and earlier leaves behind a configuration file (i.e. WebAPI.cfg.xml) after the installation process. This file can be accessed without authentication on HTTP port 80 by guessing the correct IIS webroot path. It includes system configuration parameter names and values with sensitive configuration values encrypted. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4062 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| A vulnerability was found in Hualai Xiaofang iSC5 3.2.2_112 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to improper certificate validation. The attack may be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-261788. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-20215 | 1 Cisco | 2 Webex, Webex Meetings | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the meeting-join functionality of Cisco Webex Meetings could have allowed an unauthenticated, network-proximate attacker to complete a meeting-join process in place of an intended targeted user, provided the requisite conditions were satisfied. Cisco has addressed this vulnerability in the Cisco Webex Meetings service, and no customer action is needed. This vulnerability existed due to client certificate validation issues. Prior to this vulnerability being addressed, an attacker could have exploited this vulnerability by monitoring local wireless or adjacent networks for client-join requests and attempting to interrupt and complete the meeting-join flow as another user who was currently joining a meeting. To successfully exploit the vulnerability, an attacker would need the capability to position themselves in a local wireless or adjacent network, to monitor and intercept the targeted network traffic flows, and to satisfy timing requirements in order to interrupt the meeting-join flow and exploit the vulnerability. A successful exploit could have allowed the attacker to join the meeting as another user. However, the Cisco Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) is not aware of any malicious use of the vulnerability that is described in this advisory. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15573 | 2 Solax, Solax Power | 5 Pocket Wifi 3, Pocket Wifi+4gm, Pocket Wifi+lan and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 9.4 Critical |
| The affected devices do not validate the server certificate when connecting to the SolaX Cloud MQTTS server hosted in the Alibaba Cloud (mqtt001.solaxcloud.com, TCP 8883). This allows attackers in a man-in-the-middle position to act as the legitimate MQTT server and issue arbitrary commands to devices. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13953 | 1 Gtt | 1 Tax Information System | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Bypass vulnerability in the authentication method in the GTT Tax Information System application, related to the Active Directory (LDAP) login method. Authentication is performed through a local WebSocket, but the web application does not properly validate the authenticity or origin of the data received, allowing an attacker with access to the local machine or internal network to impersonate the legitimate WebSocket and inject manipulated information. Exploiting this vulnerability could allow an attacker to authenticate as any user in the domain, without the need for valid credentials, compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application and its data. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4063 | 2026-04-15 | 3.7 Low | ||
| A vulnerability was found in EZVIZ CS-C6-21WFR-8 5.2.7 Build 170628. It has been classified as problematic. This affects an unknown part of the component Davinci Application. The manipulation leads to improper certificate validation. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The identifier VDB-261789 was assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2024-41724 | 2026-04-15 | 8.7 High | ||
| Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295) in the Gallagher Command Centre SALTO integration allowed an attacker to spoof the SALTO server. This issue affects all versions of Gallagher Command Centre prior to 9.20.1043. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1298 | 1 Tecno | 1 Com.transsion.carlcare | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| Logic vulnerability in the mobile application (com.transsion.carlcare) may lead to the risk of account takeover. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12790 | 1 Redhat | 1 Satellite | 2026-04-15 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Rubygem MQTT. By default, the package used to not have hostname validation, resulting in possible Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12414 | 1 Google | 1 Cloud Looker | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| An attacker could take over a Looker account in a Looker instance configured with OIDC authentication, due to email address string normalization.Looker-hosted and Self-hosted were found to be vulnerable. This issue has already been mitigated for Looker-hosted. Self-hosted instances must be upgraded as soon as possible. This vulnerability has been patched in all supported versions of Self-hosted. The versions below have all been updated to protect from this vulnerability. You can download these versions at the Looker download page https://download.looker.com/ : * 24.12.100+ * 24.18.193+ * 25.0.69+ * 25.6.57+ * 25.8.39+ * 25.10.22+ * 25.12.0+ | ||||
| CVE-2025-11955 | 2 Microsoft, Thegreenbow | 6 Windows, Ipsec Vpn Client, Thegreenbow Vpn Client and 3 more | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Incorrect validation of OCSP certificates vulnerability in TheGreenBow VPN, versions 7.5 and 7.6. During the IKEv2 authentication step, the OCSP-enabled VPN client establishes the tunnel even if it does not receive an OCSP response or if the OCSP response signature is invalid. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40356 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| PingOne MFA Integration Kit contains a vulnerability related to the Prompt Users to Set Up MFA configuration. Under certain conditions, this configuration could allow for a new MFA device to be paired with a target user account without requiring second-factor authentication from the target’s existing registered devices. A threat actor might be able to exploit this vulnerability to register their own MFA device with a target user’s account if they have existing knowledge of the target user’s first factor credential. | ||||