Export limit exceeded: 11055 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (11055 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-45161 | 1 Blu-castle | 1 Bcum221e | 2026-04-15 | 4.6 Medium |
| A CSRF issue was discovered in the administrative web GUI in Blu-Castle BCUM221E 1.0.0P220507. This can be exploited via a URL, an image load, an XMLHttpRequest, etc. and can result in exposure of data or unintended code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45248 | 1 Multi-dnc | 1 Multi-dnc | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High |
| Multi-DNC – CWE-35: Path Traversal: '.../...//' | ||||
| CVE-2024-4541 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Custom Product List Table plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when modifying products. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to add, delete, bulk edit, approve or cancel products via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45504 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple Alps System Integration products and the OEM products allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of the user and to perform unintended operations if the user views a malicious page while logged in. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4600 | 1 Socomec | 1 Net Vision | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Socomec Net Vision, version 7.20. This vulnerability could allow an attacker to trick registered users into performing critical actions, such as adding and updating accounts, due to lack of proper sanitisation of the ‘set_param.cgi’ file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47211 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openstack | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| In OpenStack Ironic before 21.4.4, 22.x and 23.x before 23.0.3, 23.x and 24.x before 24.1.3, and 25.x and 26.x before 26.1.0, there is a lack of checksum validation of supplied image_source URLs when configured to convert images to a raw format for streaming. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49770 | 1 Oakserver | 1 Oak | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| `oak` is a middleware framework for Deno's native HTTP server, Deno Deploy, Node.js 16.5 and later, Cloudflare Workers and Bun. By default `oak` does not allow transferring of hidden files with `Context.send` API. However, prior to version 17.1.3, this can be bypassed by encoding `/` as its URL encoded form `%2F`. For an attacker this has potential to read sensitive user data or to gain access to server secrets. Version 17.1.3 fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-51647 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Chaser324 Featured Posts Scroll allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Featured Posts Scroll: from n/a through 1.25. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5343 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| The Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'rbs_ajax_create_article' and 'rbs_ajax_reset_views' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new posts and reset gallery view counts via a forged request granted they can trick a Contributor+ level user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2023-49965 | 1 Spacex | 1 Starlink Wifi Router Gen2 | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| SpaceX Starlink Wi-Fi router Gen 2 before 2023.48.0 allows XSS via the ssid and password parameters on the Setup Page. | ||||
| CVE-2021-29050 | 1 Liferay | 2 Dxp, Portal | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the terms of use page in Liferay Portal before 7.3.6, and Liferay DXP 7.3 before service pack 1, 7.2 before fix pack 11 allows remote attackers to accept the site's terms of use via social engineering and enticing the user to visit a malicious page. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50053 | 1 Foundation Platform | 1 Foundation App | 2026-04-15 | 7.6 High |
| An issue in Foundation.app Foundation platform 1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the Web3 authentication process of Foundation, the signed message lacks a nonce (random number) | ||||
| CVE-2021-27701 | 2026-04-15 | 4.7 Medium | ||
| SOCIFI Socifi Guest wifi as SAAS is affected by Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) via the Socifi wifi portal. The application does not contain a CSRF token and request validation. An attacker can Add/Modify any random user data by sending a crafted CSRF request. | ||||
| CVE-2023-51416 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in EnvialoSimple EnvíaloSimple.This issue affects EnvíaloSimple: from n/a through 2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-2420 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in 猫宁i Morning up to bc782730c74ff080494f145cc363a0b4f43f7d3e. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. This product takes the approach of rolling releases to provide continious delivery. Therefore, version details for affected and updated releases are not available. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50738 | 1 Lexmark | 1 Printer Firmware | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| A new feature to prevent Firmware downgrades was recently added to some Lexmark products. A method to override this downgrade protection has been identified. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24355 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Updatecli is a tool used to apply file update strategies. Prior to version 0.93.0, private maven repository credentials may be leaked in application logs in case of unsuccessful retrieval operation. During the execution of an updatecli pipeline which contains a `maven` source configured with basic auth credentials, the credentials are being leaked in the application execution logs in case of failure. Credentials are properly sanitized when the operation is successful but not when for whatever reason there is a failure in the maven repository, e.g. wrong coordinates provided, not existing artifact or version. Version 0.93.0 contains a patch for the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24358 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| gorilla/csrf provides Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) prevention middleware for Go web applications & services. Prior to 1.7.2, gorilla/csrf does not validate the Origin header against an allowlist. Its executes its validation of the Referer header for cross-origin requests only when it believes the request is being served over TLS. It determines this by inspecting the r.URL.Scheme value. However, this value is never populated for "server" requests per the Go spec, and so this check does not run in practice. This vulnerability allows an attacker who has gained XSS on a subdomain or top level domain to perform authenticated form submissions against gorilla/csrf protected targets that share the same top level domain. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.7.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26816 | 2026-04-15 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in Intrexx Portal Server 12.0.2 and earlier which was classified as problematic potentially allows users with particular permissions under certain conditions to see potentially sensitive data from a different user context. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50923 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| In QUIC in RFC 9000, the Latency Spin Bit specification (section 17.4) does not strictly constrain the bit value when the feature is disabled, which might allow remote attackers to construct a covert channel with data represented as changes to the bit value. NOTE: The "Sheridan, S., Keane, A. (2015). In Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (ECCWS), University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK." paper says "Modern Internet communication protocols provide an almost infinite number of ways in which data can be hidden or embed whithin seemingly normal network traffic." | ||||