Export limit exceeded: 18109 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (18109 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-6769 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability in Smart Lock could enable a local malicious user to access Smart Lock settings without a PIN. This issue is rated as Moderate because it first requires physical access to an unlocked device where Smart Lock was the last settings pane accessed by the user. Product: Android. Versions: 5.0.2, 5.1.1, 6.0, 6.0.1. Android ID: A-29055171. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6770 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the Framework API could enable a local malicious application to access system functions beyond its access level. This issue is rated as Moderate because it is a local bypass of restrictions on a constrained process. Product: Android. Versions: 4.4.4, 5.0.2, 5.1.1, 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0. Android ID: A-30202228. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9956 | 3 Debian, Fedoraproject, Flightgear | 3 Debian Linux, Fedora, Flightgear | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The route manager in FlightGear before 2016.4.4 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a crafted Nasal script. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9976 | 1 Ibm | 2 Maximo Asset Management, Maximo Asset Management Essentials | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| IBM Maximo Asset Management 7.1, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow a remote attacker to include arbitrary files. A remote attacker could send a specially-crafted URL request, which could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the vulnerable server. IBM X-Force ID: 120252. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0100 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 10, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A DCOM object in Helppane.exe in Microsoft Windows 7 SP1; Windows Server 2008 R2; Windows 8.1; Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2; Windows RT 8.1; Windows 10 Gold, 1511, and 1607; and Windows Server 2016 allows local users to gain privileges via a crafted application, aka "Windows HelpPane Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2016-6771 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability in Telephony could enable a local malicious application to access system functions beyond its access level. This issue is rated as Moderate because it is a local bypass of restrictions on a constrained process. Product: Android. Versions: 6.0, 6.0.1, 7.0. Android ID: A-31566390. | ||||
| CVE-2016-6775 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An elevation of privilege vulnerability in the NVIDIA GPU driver could enable a local malicious application to execute arbitrary code within the context of the kernel. This issue is rated as Critical due to the possibility of a local permanent device compromise, which may require reflashing the operating system to repair the device. Product: Android. Versions: Kernel-3.10. Android ID: A-31222873. References: N-CVE-2016-6775. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0892 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2025-04-20 | 3.5 Low |
| Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to an improper session handling allowed an application specific password without permission to the files access to the users file. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0894 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2025-04-20 | 4.3 Medium |
| Nextcloud Server before 11.0.3 is vulnerable to disclosure of valid share tokens for public calendars due to a logical error. Thus granting an attacker potentially access to publicly shared calendars without knowing the share token. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0895 | 1 Nextcloud | 1 Nextcloud Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Nextcloud Server before 10.0.4 and 11.0.2 are vulnerable to disclosure of calendar and addressbook names to other logged-in users. Note that no actual content of the calendar and addressbook has been disclosed. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0896 | 1 Zulip | 1 Zulip Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Zulip Server 1.5.1 and below suffer from an error in the implementation of the invite_by_admins_only setting in the Zulip group chat application server that allowed an authenticated user to invite other users to join a Zulip organization even if the organization was configured to prevent this. | ||||
| CVE-2017-0910 | 1 Zulip | 1 Zulip Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In Zulip Server before 1.7.1, on a server with multiple realms, a vulnerability in the invitation system lets an authorized user of one realm on the server create a user account on any other realm. | ||||
| CVE-2013-7460 | 1 Mcafee | 2 Application Control, Change Control | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A write protection and execution bypass vulnerability in McAfee (now Intel Security) Application Control (MAC) 6.1.0 for Linux and earlier allows authenticated users to change binaries that are part of the Application Control whitelist and allows execution of binaries via specific conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000020 | 3 Ecos, Greatek, Totolink | 3 Embedded Web Servers, Soho, Soho | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| SYN Flood or FIN Flood attack in ECos 1 and other versions embedded devices results in web Authentication Bypass. "eCos Embedded Web Servers used by Multiple Routers and Home devices, while sending SYN Flood or FIN Flood packets fails to validate and handle the packets and does not ask for any sign of authentication resulting in Authentication Bypass. An attacker can take complete advantage of this bug and take over the device remotely or locally. The bug has been successfully tested and reproduced in some versions of SOHO Routers manufactured by TOTOLINK, GREATEK and others." | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000030 | 1 Oracle | 1 Glassfish Server | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Oracle, GlassFish Server Open Source Edition 3.0.1 (build 22) is vulnerable to Java Key Store Password Disclosure vulnerability, that makes it possible to provide an unauthenticated attacker plain text password of administrative user and grant access to the web-based administration interface. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000056 | 1 Kubernetes | 1 Kubernetes | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Kubernetes version 1.5.0-1.5.4 is vulnerable to a privilege escalation in the PodSecurityPolicy admission plugin resulting in the ability to make use of any existing PodSecurityPolicy object. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000068 | 1 Betterment | 1 Testtrack | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| TestTrack Server versions 1.0 and earlier are vulnerable to an authentication flaw in the split disablement feature resulting in the ability to disable arbitrary running splits and cause denial of service to clients in the field. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000071 | 1 Apereo | 1 Phpcas | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Jasig phpCAS version 1.3.4 is vulnerable to an authentication bypass in the validateCAS20 function when configured to authenticate against an old CAS server. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000089 | 2 Jenkins, Redhat | 2 Pipeline\, Openshift | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Builds in Jenkins are associated with an authentication that controls the permissions that the build has to interact with other elements in Jenkins. The Pipeline: Build Step Plugin did not check the build authentication it was running as and allowed triggering any other project in Jenkins. | ||||
| CVE-2017-1000106 | 1 Jenkins | 1 Blue Ocean | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Blue Ocean allows the creation of GitHub organization folders that are set up to scan a GitHub organization for repositories and branches containing a Jenkinsfile, and create corresponding pipelines in Jenkins. Its SCM content REST API supports the pipeline creation and editing feature in Blue Ocean. The SCM content REST API did not check the current user's authentication or credentials. If the GitHub organization folder was created via Blue Ocean, it retained a reference to its creator's GitHub credentials. This allowed users with read access to the GitHub organization folder to create arbitrary commits in the repositories inside the GitHub organization corresponding to the GitHub organization folder with the GitHub credentials of the creator of the organization folder. Additionally, users with read access to the GitHub organization folder could read arbitrary file contents from the repositories inside the GitHub organization corresponding to the GitHub organization folder if the branch contained a Jenkinsfile (which could be created using the other part of this vulnerability), and they could provide the organization folder name, repository name, branch name, and file name. | ||||